The phrase Web 2.0 was coined by O’Reilly Media to refer to a supposed second generation of Internet-based services that let people collaborate and share information online in a new way—such as social networking sites, wikis, communication tools, and folksonomies. O’Reilly Media, in collaboration with MediaLive International, used the phrase as a title for a series of conferences and since then it has become a popular, if ill-defined and often criticized, buzzword amongst the technical and marketing communities.
“Web 2.0 is different. It’s about AWS (Amazon Web Services). It’s not on the web site for users to see. It’s about making the internet useful for computers.” –Jeff Bezos, Web 2.0, 2004
“Web 2.0 is all about remixing, not about designing. The best metaphor for web 2.0 is the DJ, not the composer. Web 2.0 is a product of remix culture.” –Jonathan Boutelle
“A vision of the Web in which information is broken up into “microcontent” units that can be distributed over dozens of domains. The Web of documents has morphed into a Web of data. We are no longer just looking to the same old sources for information. Now we’re looking to a new set of tools to aggregate and remix microcontent in new and useful ways.” –Richard MacManus & Joshua Porter, Web 2.0 for Designers
“Web 2.0 is giving up control. It is setting the data free. It is providing services that work with other people’s data. It is about having a valuable resource and making no presumptions about how or where that resource will be used.” –DeWitt Clinton
“At present I see five characteristics of the Web 2.0 infrastructure, or Web 2.0 applications: “The Web As Platform, Point of Presence, Microcontent-based, Second order content, and Semantic Web / Metaweb.” –Mediatope
Whether or not we call it Web 2.0 “I believe that we’re seeing a huge shift right now: to the Era of Interfaces.” -Web 2.0 as the Era of Interfaces
Like blow him in web software of platform provision and separate way without at the Internet the text editing possible nine writings * up height blood D Oh it faces each other in back and MS `web 2.0 `services it provides and by the Internet current of event big benefit, it diffuses. . . . . To country still unfamiliarity but one sun United States which passes low I in the keyword which heats one Internet industry hotly in the center was grade yearly `web 2.0′. 2004 beginning first this terminology which gives a name aimed and nine writings, with the Amazon .com back same recent times the service which the Internet enterprises which succeed provide to make with past should have become discriminational anger how, it came. Still the justice which is clear gets off and the support passes by `web 2.0 conferences of two orders which are not but’ and the concept is materialized. Web (the Internet) the thing attaching 2.0 Iran modifier which after Iran name is prepared in 1.0 web from one household goes over with the next generation and it went it means. If it will be like that and the web passed by what kind of generation change will be the thing? . . . . But neither the critical public opinion against like this atmosphere of recent times writes. These people the web 2.0 the jar “gets up a once Internet boom again and in the fraud means for and it is only it talks” until. Even the justice which is clear `web 2.0 against are what’ as ever it did not drop. `Place height blood D which are the Internet encyclopedia Oh’ the just Edo against the web 2.0 which is recorded “(web 2.0) the agreement regarding meaning which is accurate does not become accomplished still and” it is being recorded. Is like this the justice of web 2.0 Iran terminology being innocent is relation of birth background transition of web 2.0 Iran terminology. . . . . Are the web and web 2.0 with from `platforms which Korean electric computer won announces in last year November what?’From even from the report which is “the web 2.0 analyzed the where the technique is not as the ”.
|
|
